Jordan Palmer The new , Copyright 2022, Kitguru.net All Rights Reserved, Samsung Exynos 2200 RDNA 2 GPU underperforms in early benchmarks, Error, group does not exist! Facebook Just remember that Geekbench scores are practically meaningless out of context, unlike say a metric like frames per second (fps). As for 990, lol that thing lag like hell, with normal operations mind u. Harmas, 19 Jan 2022Bro wtf? Snapdragon 8G1 is today's Snapdragon 808, so it seems.
However this does not bode well for ARM in general. Heavy games runs better on Dimensity 1200 with Mali G77MP9 than on Exynos 2100 with G78mp14 or even Tensor with G78mp20. Samsung did not brag about major performance or efficiency gains for the Exynos 2200. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Guide. In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. However, the difference is evident compared to the Snapdragon Gen1-equipped phone, with the Exynos 2200 being much slower. I do OWN S20+ 5G version and it is on 990 and TBH haven't seen it lag. Featured Tech News, Graphics, Mobile. The Exynos 2200 scored lower than the Qualcomm SoC in 3DMark Wildlife tests and GFXBench Manhattan offscreen tests. Please refresh the page and try again. But that doesnt change the fact that Samsung is nowhere near ready to challenge the Snapdragon dominance. This might change in future when the AMD GPU matures. 
So what can we gauge from all this? We put both through our usual suite of benchmarks to get an idea of how they perform. We may get a commission from qualifying
One Tipster Sheds Light, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Graphics Card Allegedly Delivers Over 160 FPS In Control With RT & DLSS at 4K, 2x Performance Gain Over RTX 3090, AMD Will Not Lose Market Share Until 2025 Says Wedbush, Nancy Pelosi Now Sits on Over $1 Million in Unrealized Gains on the Recent NVIDIA Options Exercise as the CHIPS Act Nears Approval, Stunning Unreal Engine 5 Powered Breaking Bad Open-World Game Showcased In New 4K Concept Trailer, AMD Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 CPUs Including AVX-512 Benchmarks & AM5 Motherboards Get Improved Support In AIDA64, Intel Core i9-13900K Raptor Lake CPU Gaming & Synthetic Performance Benchmarks Leaked, 5% Faster Than Core i9-12900K On Average, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Graphics Card Almost Twice As Fast As RTX 3090 In 3DMark Time Spy Extreme Benchmark, Alleges Rumor, Intel Officially Unveils Arc A750 Limited Edition Graphics Card Performance Benchmarks, Up To 17% Faster Than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 at 1440p, Exclusive: Intel Arc A-Series Desktop GPU Price/Performance Positioning, TDP and Memory Configurations. Again Exynos is weaker than Snapdragon, especially in gpu. Perhaps you're not even an apple pest but just a deadbeat vivo/oppo user who hates everything he can't own LOL, LOL, 21 Jan 2022Facts:
To test our respective Galaxy S22 Plus models, we used the industry-standard Geekbench 5 for the CPU testing. Didn't know so much Samsung hate can make you even lie! We check over 250 million products every day for the best prices, How to watch Love Island UK 2022 for free and online, Samsung QN90A Neo QLED TV review: The king of QLEDs, Best iPhones in the UK 2022: The top iPhones you can buy now, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and Flip 4 just tipped for August 10 launch, The best tech tutorials and in-depth reviews, Try a single issue or save on a subscription, Issues delivered straight to your door or device.
They're only useful for seeing how various chips compare to each other. The Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score difference between Exynos 2100 and Exynos 2200 is marginal. Perhaps then we'll see something that can truly challenge Qualcomm, and perhaps it'll give Samsung enough confidence to ship more Galaxy S and Galaxy Z devices with its own chips in other markets. Far more interesting is the disparity between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1's Adreno GPU with the AMD RDNA2-based graphic processor on the Exynos 2200. Nothing will change, Samsung has too :
It's con All I can gather from this is : Samsungs new chip is MEH , and not to trust AnTuTu :D. I know i complaint about exynos bcos i USED 990 and 2100, few that i forgot. If Exynos 2200 were good it would be used on the Galaxy phones in South Korea. Just think about Snapdragon moreLoL, yes, for 870, 865+, 865, 860 and so on, for 888, 888+ 8 gen 1, no. You're just an apple loving pest, if you ever used 990, you'd know it never lags at LOL, geekbench is used by plebs who have 0, literally 0 knowledge of benchmarks. No Exynos No MediaTek. Todays deals: $99.99 Fire TVs, AirPods discounts, painting supplies sale, more, Google just banned 52 malware Android apps from the Play store, you should delete them now, This recalled honey is secretly filled with erectile dysfunction drugs, so stop eating it, Powerful solar flare is heading to Earth today, space weather experts warn, National Hot Dog Day 2022: Where to get free and cheap hot dogs, Divers discovered an ancient Greek shipwreck thats full of sunken treasure, and its fascinating, Im obsessed with this kitchen must-have that makes meals better, Oops: Amazon forgot to end these 25 amazing Prime Day deals, Best Apple Watch deals today on Series 7 and SE, Best Deals Today Daily Deals & Sales: LIVE, Your iPhone has a hidden page that shows which apps track your internet searches, iPhone 14 Pro reference model leaks, showing the new pill-and-hole display design, Apple to pay $50 million for faulty MacBook Pro keyboard design, Chris Evans iPhone home button problem has an easy fix that he doesnt like, iPhone 14: Latest leaks, rumors, and everything we know so far, Engineer behind the USB-C iPhone repeated the trick with AirPods, iOS 15.6 now available with bug fixes for Mail, Safari, and more.
and Middle East. For one thing, there should be an adequate number of tests done to reveal which chipsets GPU thrives in which particular benchmark. The Exynos 2200 is supposed to be the first mobile chip to support ray tracing in games, but its raw performance in the graphics benchmarks certainly didn't live up to the hype. While we recommending calibrating the screen brightness to 200 cd/m2 (nits) when testing battery life, this setting cannot be enforced by the benchmark app. Tom's Guide is supported by its audience. News To be more precise, when putting the 3DMark Wild Life scores of both S22 Ultra phones side-to-side, the Snapdragon is about 30% faster. The scores mirror Computer Bases findings. Yup it gets warm and has treble battery life but it never lagged for me also before you jump and say you have nothing on it mind you i have around 200GB data on it and lots of apps and games. This brings us to two independent Galaxy S22 benchmark tests that compared the Exynos 2200 SoC to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Second India has been on EXYNOS for ever.. Jordan likes finding new things to dive into, from books and games to new mechanical keyboard switches and fun keycap sets. Outside of work, youll catch him streaming almost every new movie and TV show release as soon as it's available. Waste of money don't buy the S22 seriesEven failed to beat Snapdragon 888 while at bionic at 1st Rank Goodbye Samsung , I can't image the soc with AMD GPU being this bad despite all the hype, Samsung Exynos 2200 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, Samsung Exynos 2200 or Samsung Exynos 2100, Samsung Exynos 2200 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 870, Samsung Exynos 2200 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus, Samsung Exynos 2200 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Samsung Exynos 2200 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.
Fuck you Samsungit just became a money ripping company now. Benchmarklist of all known CPUs that are used in laptops (desktop and laptop CPUs), Samsung Galaxy S22 review - One of the best compact Android smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S22: Compact all-rounder and iPhone competitor, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G review - The fusion of two smartphone models, Galaxy S22 Ultra: Samsung's top smartphone still needs to work out some kinks, Samsung Galaxy S22+ smartphone review: The big version of the Galaxy S22, Samsung Galaxy S22+: High-end smartphone and the golden mean in the new Galaxy S line-up, 5G NR Sub-6GHz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat. Bad GPU gains and Dragon is always better. As a first, the Exynos 2200 integrates a graphics card based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture called Samsung Xclipse 920). - use proper cooling systems on their devices. The review embargo for Galaxy S22 phones hasn't lifted yet, but benchmark scores are beginning to make their way online. There was a problem. Tools
Maybe Exynos 2400 of 2024 with the third gen AMD GPU will be good. The fact that it can go head-to-head with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in computing power is very impressive. Anonymous, 18 Jan 2022Dragon is always better. Youtube
By The iPhone SE 3 will replace the second-gen model in the coming months. Joker: "Very poor choice of words." Good luck to the people in Europe and West Asia (India?) The SoC also integrates a 5G modem with up to 7.35 Gbps (5G NR Sub-6Hz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat.24 DL / Cat.22 UL) similar to the Exynos 2100. installs reaches So all in all what i can see is either you are lying or never had the mentioned device! Even Samsung fans like Ice Universe keep criticizing Samsungs inability to compete in this field. Surely, AMDs expertise would have greatly benefited Samsungs chipmaking efforts, right? But there might be buyers out there who will want to wait for more detailed hands-on experiences with the phone before committing their money towards a new Samsung flagship.
Terms of use
Glossary
I hated them all, moreWhaaaaaat? Home
But you're here to see how the two chips powering Samsung's phones compare, so without further ado, let's take a look at our Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs. Exynos 2200 comparison using the Galaxy S22 Plus. The numbers are great even if they are not the best out there. Or that the SoC would lead to overheating issues while trying to match the competition. Then Samsung started teasing an Exynos 2200 event for January, several weeks before the Galaxy S22 Unpacked press conference. First gen of any tech product is always crappy. However, a previous OpenCL GPU testrevealed that the Exynos 2200 comfortably beat the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. For popular models, the median scores are calculated from thousands of benchmark results.
We already know from a recent benchmark comparison that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Galaxy S22 Ultra is no match for the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Battery life is very sensitive to changes in screen brightness. Maybe it's a Samsung fab thing. 
Anonymous, 27 Jan 2022LOL, geekbench is used by plebs who have 0, literally 0 knowledge of benchmarks. Normally, we wouldn't bat an eye at this considering how far behind Qualcomm silicon past Exynos chips have proven to be. samsung user, 27 Jan 2022You're just an apple loving pest, if you ever used 990, you'd know it never lags at moreI used s20 ultra exynos for a year and yeah it does overheating from day one, lags randomly even settings some time lags when scrolling!. The CPU performance in our benchmarks was slightly below the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (fastest Android SoC currently) and the Apple A15 in the iPhone 13. snapdragon panas suhu exynos benchmarks powerful qualcomm telset 4nm gizchina qualcomms testu gpu geekbench a52 5g dimensity kostum hadiah pemain The latest numbers received by TechAltar over the Exynos 2200s performance will disappoint anyone who was hoping that Samsung would finally learn from its long list of mistakes and mass produce a custom silicon that impresses in both performance and power efficiency. BGR is a part of Penske Media Corporation.
Unfortunately, your joy will quickly turn to disappointment as we also reported that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 beat the Exynos 2200 in an earlier GFXBench test. Twitter As a result, the range of battery life scores submitted by the public is much wider than that seen when testing under controlled conditions. When hes not writing about the most recent tech news for BGR, he closely follows the events in Marvels Cinematic Universe and other blockbuster franchises. Luckily, we got our hands on two Galaxy S22 Plus models one with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and the other running an Exynos 2200. Separately, YouTuberErdi za (via NotebookCheck) actually had his hands on both the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Exynos 2200 Galaxy S22 phones. will be the guinea pigs. Facts: Discover more at UL.com. The result, on paper, sounded very exciting and I hoped we'd see Samsung break free of Qualcomm's monopoly on Android phone processors in the US. Any chip over mtk 1200 can take any load from any app nowadays, so the pure power is enough. Some people test their device under less than ideal conditions. KitGuru says: The Galaxy S22 isn't available yet and Samsung has promised more updates, so we may see improved peak performance in later benchmarks. Theyll be faster than older flagships, and Samsung can still optimize the performance via software updates. It's clear which SoC offers the best GPU peak performance, but most phones lack sustained performance, and that's where the Exynos 2200 may shine. We just wrapped up our Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus review, finding Samsung's new 6.6-inch device to be a solid update if not a big leap forward from the model it replaces. Reviews The Exynos 2200 doesnt lose just in GPU tests (below) but also in CPU tests (above).
Contact us I hated them all, moreYou're just an apple loving pest, if you ever used 990, you'd know it never lags at the expense of heat and battery. (For an overall look at the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1's performance, check out our Galaxy S22 Ultra benchmarks report.). The Samsung Exynos 2200 is a high end SoC with 8 cores in three clusters. All Rights Reserved. Go on TechTablets' YouTube account and see how Xiaomi 12/12Pro isn't able to complete a 20 minutes long 3DTest. The SoC is barely able to match the Apple A13 Bionic. Frankly, these aren't the results I was hoping for when I heard that Samsung and AMD had teamed up. The teasers started last year when AMD mentioned its partnership with Samsung, teasing game console GPU experiences coming to mobile phones. chipset exynos a14 bionic beaten No Exynos No MediaTek. Change Ad Consent The first lesson is that the some of us might have gotten a wee bit too excited about the Exynos 2200 in the build-up to the S22 release, specifically about the chipset's GPU. Check your syntax! Perhaps we should use Mediate moreMali GPU is the issue. UL Solutions is a global safety science company that's dedicated to helping its customers achieve their safety, security and sustainability goals. Samsung made a big deal about its Exynos 2200 chips in the past few months. For example, the device may be too hot or have other apps running in the background. It's a bit alarming to me that in GPU stress tests of #GalaxyS22Ultra, the Snapdragon 8G1 has a stability of 48% while the Exynos 2200 has 72%.The Exynos 2200 really has that much better sustained performance?Are we seeing history lolSource: @PBKreviews @TheTechChap pic.twitter.com/5YseGv0J72, Golden Reviewer (@Golden_Reviewer) February 11, 2022.
In addition to this, an image processor for 200mP in single camera mode and 8K video, an AI engine with a dual-core NPU and DPS and various GNSS systems (GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo). I would expect it to thermal throttle even worse. However this does not bode well for ARM in general. Sadly, it was not to be because the octa-core CPU belonging to the latest SoC is only 5 percent faster compared to the cores running in the Exynos 2100. Zero, 19 Jan 2022Mali GPU is the issue. The ones in the US, South Korea, India and others use the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 system-on-chip, while the UK/EU variants run on Samsung's own Exynos 2200 chip. Forget about them. He also says that Qualcomm had a better GPU, with the chipset maker making improvements of 50 percent compared to the last generation, thus widening that performance gap. That said, the Exynos 2200 is a huge step above previous versions. Three more slower ARM Cortex-A710 with up to 2.52 GHz for performance tasks and four efficient cores using the ARM Cortex-A510 architecture clocked at up to 1.82 GHz. Do not sell my data. From the times of 16mm chips the battery life is the same despite all the development of screens, thermal cooling systems etc. The chip is produced in the modern 4nm process at Samsung using EUV. One of these tests also covers Apples A-series SoCs that power the iPhone. And just like its predecessor, there are actually two versions of the Galaxy S22 Plus. Meanwhile Apple is getting more and more distance to them. It's considered to be one of the worst benchmarks. Anything made by Scamsung is an automatic pass for me, inefficient, power hungry, heats up like crazy, throttle like no tomorrow Just no. published 18 February 22. Outside of work, you can find him poring over open-source software and his studies. What's more, any improvements to the Exynos line will also benefit the Google Tensor chips, since Samsung has at least some involvement in the design process for Google's system-on-chip. No improvements over SD888? Due to bigger execution units G710mp10 is far more powerfull than G77MP9according to some leaks, efficiency seems to be better than Adreno 730 too. The Galaxy S22 is the first major phone in the US to use the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, so it's the basis upon which we gauge the new chip's performance until we see more powerful gaming phones later this year. sales. One fast ARM Cortex-S2 with up to 2.8 GHz for single thread performance. Created at Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:34:17 +0200 +0.001s 0.001s, #3 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s 0.01s, #6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14146 +0.001s 0.013s, #7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.014s, #8 got single benchmarks 14146 +0.007s 0.021s, #9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s 0.021s, #10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.024s 0.045s, #11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.045s, #12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.045s, #13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s 0.048s, #14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.048s, #15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.049s, #16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.049s, #17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.049s, #18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.049s, #19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s 0.055s, #20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.055s, #21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.055s, #22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.055s, #23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.055s, #24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.13s 0.186s, #25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s 0.19s, #26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.19s, #27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.19s, #28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s 0.201s, #29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.202s, #30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.202s, #31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.204s, #32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.204s, #33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s 0.207s, #34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.208s, #35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.208s, #36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.208s, #37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s 0.211s, #38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s 0.214s, #39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s 0.221s, #40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.222s, #41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.223s, #42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.224s, #43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.224s, #44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.225s, #45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.226s, #46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.228s, #47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.228s, #48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.23s, #49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.231s, #50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.231s, #51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.231s, #52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.012s 0.243s, #53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.244s, #54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s 0.247s, #55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.25s, #56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s 0.252s, #57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.253s, #58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.253s, #59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.254s, #60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.254s, #61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.255s, #62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.255s, #63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.256s, #64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.258s, #65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.259s, #66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.26s, #67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.261s, #68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.261s, #69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.261s, #70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s 0.264s, #71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.267s, #72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.267s, #73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.267s, #74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.267s, #75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.267s, #76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.269s, #77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.269s, #78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.269s, #79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.27s, #80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.27s, #81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.27s, #82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.27s, #83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.27s, #84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.27s, #85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.27s, #86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s 0.272s, #87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.272s, #88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.273s, #89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.273s, #90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.273s, #91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.274s, #92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.274s, #93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.275s, #94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.275s, #95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.275s, #96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.276s, #97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.276s, #98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s 0.276s, #99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.276s, #100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.276s, #101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.277s, #102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.277s, #103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.278s, #104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.279s, #105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.279s, #106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.279s, #107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.279s, #108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.279s, #109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.279s, #110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.28s, #111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s 0.28s, #112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.281s, #113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s 0.281s, #114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.282s, #115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.282s, #116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.282s, #117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.283s, #118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.283s, #119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.283s, #120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.283s, #121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.283s, #122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.285s, #123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.286s, #124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s 0.287s, #125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.288s, #126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.288s, #127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.288s, #128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.29s, #129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.29s, #130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.29s, #131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s 0.29s, #132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.29s, #133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.29s, #134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.29s, #135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.291s, #136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.292s, #137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.292s, #138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.292s, #139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.292s, #140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.292s, #141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.016s 0.308s, #142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.308s, #143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.308s, #144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.309s, #145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.31s, #146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s 0.311s, #147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.312s, #148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.312s, #149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s 0.312s, #150 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s 0.326s, Samsung Galaxy S22 (Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.10")